have ended the debate between presidential candidates in the Belarusian TV and thus an important stage of this campaign. It is unknown when the next time the representatives of the democratic opposition will have access to national TV. You can not even exclude that this will happen again before the next presidential election in five years.
What did these performances on television? First of all, anyone could see, there is no shortage of normal people who deserve to be president.
say he is not young, who could replace Alexander Lukashenko? So there is a positive and bright Vital Rymasheuski or constructively cautious Ales Mikhalevich. Say, the opposition wants to break off relations with Russia? So there must be balanced, constructive, almost prorasiyskiya Vladimir Nyaklyaeu, Andrei Sannikov Yaroslav Romanchuk, and even outright Slavophiles Viktor Tereshchenko. Say, the candidates do not have enough experience? But what about the very Sannikov or Gregory Kostusev or military Nikolai Statkevich?
Moreover, the candidates studiously avoided criticizing each other. Many of them jointly and severally urged voters not to vote early and come to October Square in Minsk navechar December 19. Most commentators agree that the opinion that the opposition was made at the debate worthy.
Voters were presented to the candidates for every taste, and if there were better conditions for campaigning and a great hope to control the integrity of counting votes, it would be good. A wide range of niche candidates can pull votes from the most obvious one, and ensure a second round, which was would have been much more interesting.
However, the opposition seems to be sufficiently substantiated, it is why people should not vote early - as most fraud occurs is through the substitution of uncontrolled ballots early voting.
Moreover, sounded very weak response to the question of how people resist unlawful coercion to early voting. Just think, Vladimir Nyaklyaeu said students should not be afraid refuse to vote early, because when excluded, the opposition will be able to help get a higher education outside Belarus. The main reason for the program name Kalinovskiy and should be in the fact that future generations of students were not afraid to assert their rights.
But most importantly - the opposition still has no real possibility exercise control over the vote count, as still not clear how to avoid a mass of early voting.
Therefore, the most meaningful behavior conscious voters, it seems to continue to remain a boycott or, alternatively, creative sabotage the elections.
interesting way to do this, for example, suggested that Harry Pogonyailo, who writes about the possibility of tear sheet into two parts, half of the signatures of the committee members to keep at home, and another drop in the box. This will allow then prove the violation through the control over the number of spoiled ballots. But without proper mass does not work neither this option nor whether any other. Recipe Democratic victory has not yet been proposed.
itself out in the area, even hundreds of thousands of people will create the maximum opportunity to depart from the script in 2006 , and at least, not without eventualnaga international pressure to bring the power to negotiate with the democratic community - but this again will only prerequisites which have yet to use it.
Plus, the area - it is an opportunity for people to express themselves and gain emotional and moral leadership among the opposition.
Although it should still be able to keep - for example, that do not have the strength to have passed through the most severe test of Alexander Kozulin.
http://n-europe.eu/columns/2010/12/08/ests_za_kago_galasavats
0 comments:
Post a Comment