There are things that even in democratic countries should not be done public. The second most important skills a journalist after the ability to extract information - this is the ability to keep secrets. The journalist should be able to expose sources and think about the consequences of the publication itself, not to raise their information away from people who do not deserve and to avoid becoming a pawn in someone's PR kampanni. For a journalist, "the silence - it's gold."
Same details backroom negotiations and political backstage.
Julian Asanzh a spill on the Internet with a dirty bag of diplomatic linen, which of course will lyubapytna read, but access to that public has no real need.
experts and government and even more so because in general they know what is written there. Those who follow the appropriate situation, and so it is known that China is rather skeptical look at "depraved child" - North Korea or that the leaders of the Sunni Arab countries in the Middle East are to the current Iranian government, almost from the same dislikes as Israel. The most interesting and useful aspect published - the one that concerns opaque authoritarian Governments, although this there are relatively few. As rightly says Yulia Latynina,
fight vykryvalnitstvam respect the democratic American state where more comfortable and safer than doing the same to the Government of Russia or China.
For simple townsfolk are really able to be "opening" of the kind that government spying that prominent politicians do not always behave properly in private and in general during the couple even think of something quite different what they say at press conferences. Western bloggers have already made fun of the "sensational" headlines on Wikileaks: «Gifts Gives NOT Santa Claus, and your parents," Hitler Was a bit racist "," Darth Vader - Luke Skywalker's father. " Good Morning, Captain.
But more than this, for an untrained layman-reader This, in turn, a great opportunity to get under the manipulation of various political forces that might aggravate tension around that Iran, which the North Korea.
Publications Wikileaks primarily affect the balance of emphasis in public opinion on a global scale.
This will enable individual politicians to manipulate the company in accordance with their interests. It is unlikely that the publication itself can cause a serious crisis, but in this naspelyh situations it may be able to at least be a match for presentation to the box with the dynamite.
http://nn.by/?c=ar&i=46687
